Correlation Between Biochemical and Immunological Alterations with Updated Therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review Article

Bahir Abdul Razzaq Mshimesh1, Basma Talib Al-Sudani2, Suzan Yousif Jasim2

1Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad-Iraq

2Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad-Iraq

Received: 29-Dec-2018 , Accepted: 28-Jan-2019

Keywords: Alzheimer`s disease, Neuropathology, New biomarkers, Update targeting therapies

Full-Text PDF      

Google Scholar  

How To Cite       


Alzheimer`s disease (AD) is the most widely recognized reason for dementia in more advanced age subjects and it`s a vital general medical issue. Since Alzheimer portrayed the primary instance of the AD over a century back, much advancement has been made in reading the pathogenic and clinical findings of this disorder. Generous progression was made in describing pre-dementia phases of the AD, for example, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and enhancing the diagnostic and treatment choices accessible for overseeing AD. Our capacity to discover the `fix` for AD eventually depends not just on possessing an exact view of the cellular procedures, but additionally on having ideal biomarkers and valuable neuroimaging tests to empower early analysis and convenient helpful mediation in suspected people. The object for this article is to give a short review to the AD and the related researches in this field. The article accentuates clinical and neurobiological parts of the AD. Furthermore, this survey portrays progress in the utilization of biomarkers for analysis of AD and features continuous endeavors to create novel treatments.

1 Introduction

The total populace is quickly maturing and become elders, and the quantity of individuals with dementia is predicted to develop from 30 million today to 60 million constantly 2025. In USA alone, 5 million or 1 out of 10 people > 65 years suffering from Alzheimer`s disease (AD), the most widely recognized reason for dementia1. As dementia conveys critical ramifications for patients, their relatives, and our general public, it is basic for balanced doctors to have a strong comprehension of this disorder. The reason for this review is to give a short review of the AD and its recent studies. The article underscores clinical and neurobiological parts of the AD with which any medical staff ought to be well-known. Likewise, the article portrays progress in the utilization of biomarkers for assessment of AD and features continuous endeavors to create novel treatments2.

2 Historical reviews

The German neurologist Dr. Alois Alzheimer was the first pioneer with depicting out of dementia, which then termed later as "Alzheimer disease". In his 1906 symposium and a consequent 1907 article, Alzheimer depicted a 51-years-elderly female with an `exceptional illness of the brain cortex,` who was suffered memory defects and speech impedance, confusion, social manifestations (mental defects with dreams) and psychosocial disturbances. Noteworthy, huge number of the clinical findings and neurotic signs that Alzheimer discovered during a century staying as it for our comprehension of AD today3.

3 Types of dementia

Dementia is an age- related disorder (a gathering of co-happening findings) that includes significant weakening of mental activities4. Various psychological events can be disabled with dementia, involving memory, speech, thinking, leadership, visuospatial capacity, cognation, and other intellectual considerations. In people with dementia, subjective weaknesses are regularly joined by changes in identity, enthusiastic direction, and social practices. Imperatively, the psychological and conduct changes that happen with dementia interferes with work, social exercises and connections, and debilitate a man`s capacity to perform routine day by day exercises (e.g., shopping, cooking, housekeeping, overseeing funds, driving, and other individual considerations)4,5.

There are a few reversible and irreversible reasons for dementia. Reversible dementias (additionally alluded to as `pseudo-dementias`) are generally uncommon yet conceivably treatable and happen optional to another restorative condition, including depressive states, nourishing lacks (e.g., B12 depletion), endocrinal issue (e.g., hypothyroidism), space-occupying lesion (e.g., malignant disorders of brain), hydrocephalus, or chemical substances misuse. Certain classes of prescriptions additionally can possibly cause mental impedance in more established old populations (e.g., cholinergic inhibitors, analgesics, psychotropics, and hypnotics)4,6. Irreversible (essential) dementias include neurodegenerative as well as vascular procedures in the mind. Alzheimer disease is the most widely recognized reason for irreversible dementia, representing up to 70% of all dementia cases in the USA (Fig 1)7.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a disorder relevant by memory and additionally other subjective hindrances that appeared before the decrease in cognizance related to the ordinary advanced-age process. This impairment is frequently viewed as an antecedent to dementia or can be considered as a transitional status between normal cognitive aging and dementia. Other kinds of essential dementia incorporate vascular dementia (10-20%), dementia-related to Parkinson`s disorder, frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and others8.

4 Risk factors and etiology

Alzheimer disease is a multi-factorial ailment, with no single reason known, and a few modifiable and non-modifiable hazard factors are related to its improvement and prognosis. Age is the most serious hazard factor for the initiation of the AD. The probability of growing AD elevated exponentially with age at regular intervals after 65 years (Fig 2)9,10. By far, most of the people experiencing AD are matured 65 or more and have delayed findings or `sporadic` AD (95%). Uncommon hereditary changes are related with the advancement of the AD before age 65 or, in other words, early findings or `familial` AD (5%)11.

People with genetic types of the AD associated with autosomal overwhelming transformation in both of the presenilin protein situated over chromosomes no. 1 & 14 or in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) situated over chromosome no. 21. Furthermore, people suffering Down`s disorder (Mongolism) had an expanded danger of growing early-findings of AD. The hereditary cause of the sporadic AD is highly complicated and less surely knew. It is realized that the 4 allele related to the apolipoprotein-E (APOE) situated over chromosome no. 19 is hazard issue for the advancementof sporadic AD12. The predominance of the AD is more common in female`s gender, indicating more extended future of women13. Lower education level was related with the expanded danger of dementia with AD; steady with possibility that learning serves to build a man`spsychological features and versatility to neuropathology of AD14. Huge evidence reported that cerebrovascular hazard factors assume a critical factor in both the advancement and prognosis of the AD; individuals with a background marked by diabetes, overweight, elevated blood pressure, and cigarette have a considerably lifted danger of AD. The family history of the AD in first-degree relatives and a past exposure to a head injury with loss of awareness is likewise enhancing the chance for AD15.

5 Neuropathology of AD

AD is a neurodegenerative cerebellar condition that causes a noteworthy interruption of typical mind structure and capacity. Cellularly, the AD is portrayed by a dynamic loss of cortical neurons, particularly pyramidal cells, that intervene in higher psychological functions16,17. Substantial studies additionally recommend that AD causes synaptic disconnection, disturbing orders inside neural circuits which are vital for learning and subjective functions, like memory and others18.

AD-mediated degeneration starts particularly in hippocampus and entorhinal cortex19. Damage to these mind structures results in memory and learning deficiencies that are traditionally seen with early clinical signs of the AD. The degeneration at that point spreads all through the different sits of the cortex and to parietal territories. As stage advances, neurodegeneration can be found in the frontal cortex and inevitably all through the greater part of the rest of the neocortex. Of note is that AD makes articulated harm in different parts of the limbic framework, involving hippocampal arrangement and fiber tracts that interface it to the cortex of brain. This far-reaching example of neurodegeneration, influencing both limbic and neocortical areas, associates intimately with the variety of subjective shortages and conduct changes that AD patient`s exhibit20.

Notwithstanding, psychological defects over different functions (memory, thinking, speech, and visuospatial work), patients with AD demonstrate a hindered capacity to perform exercises of everyday living and regularly encounter mental and psycho-emotional influences. It`s speculated that neuronal injury found in the AD is identified with statement of unusual proteins, both in and out of neurons. These lesions are the characteristic features of AD injuries and termed "plaques and tangles". The irregular proteins are stored in cortex following distribution in the neural networks that intercedes memory, learning, and other intellectual functions21.

Senile plaques represent extracellular aggregations of amyloid protein, comprising amyloid-beta protein (Aβ) that is insoluble. Regularly, tissues all through life discharge soluble β-amyloids post breaking of the APP by γ and β-secretase enzymes (Fig 3). AD includes unusual breaking of APP that leads to deposition of Aβ into thick β- sheets and development of these precipitates. It is trusted that astrocytes and neuroglia at that point mediate an inflammation to scavenge the amyloid, and this usually ending with damage to the affected neurons and their neuritis22.

Neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) are neuronal intracellular strangely hyper-phosphorylated protein tau, which in typical shape fills in as a microtubule balancing out protein and play an important role in intracellular neuronal transport (Fig 3). It is conceivable that NFT interfere with typical axonal transport of parts fundamental for appropriate neuronal capacity and survival (e.g., neuronal growth factors, synapses, and mitochondrial components), and at the end making neurons die21.

Several reports documented that amyloid arrangement in the cerebral cortex is one of the earliest findings in the AD, going before the clinical beginning of the illness by about 10-20 years. Indeed, an ongoing report proposes that the underlying arrangement of NFT might happen in brainstem as opposed to temporal lobe and might go before presence of the main neocortical amyloid plaques22.

6 Diagnosis of AD

6.1 Clinical findings

In clinical settings, the investigation of the AD is generally founded on medicinal history, physical and neuropsychological examinations and, additionally, rules out the different etiologies utilizing specific subordinate investigations. Clinical determination of AD has a precision of 70 to 90% comparing with pathological finding, with more prominent corrections being accomplished in a claim to special clinics, for example, memory issue clinics23. Foundation of clinical assessment is an arrangement of specific requirements originally settled in 1984 and refreshed in 2011 according to National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer`s Association workgroup. At the point when the patient`s intellectual weakness has atypical clinical signs or is suspected to be because of different etiologies notwithstanding AD, the determination of AD dementia is suggested. Patients with an AD, for the most part, have typical manifestations on neurological and physical tests. Figure 4 summarize stages of the AD with their symptoms24.

6.2 Neuroimaging and laboratory investigations

Neuroimaging and Lab tests are utilized just for academic investigation or as an aid to the clinical requirements for the AD, especially to exclude head injuries and distinguish `reversible` reasons for dementia. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might be valuable to exclude head tumors, hydrocephalus, and cerebrovascular disorders. The MRI has been utilized to think about local patterns of cerebellar shrinkage in patients with MCI and AD25,26. Atrophy of the temporal lobe, including the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus specifically, is the soonest and most conspicuous MRI highlight apparent in the AD and predicts movement from MCI to AD dementia (Fig 5)27. The soonest indication of AD noticeable on positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) is the hypo-metabolism of the precuneus and back cingulate cortex. This hypo-metabolism is additionally recognizable at the MCI phase of the AD28.

The main research and biochemical lab facilities that the American Academy of Neurology used to be performed on standard features of dementia are serum level of vitamin B12 and thyroid hormone levels, like free thyroxine (T4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). For the time being, parameters of the AD were expected to enhance choice of patients in preliminary studies; meanwhile, in the term of long duration, lab markers are expected to recognize more hazard patients for good management and, additionally, to screen AD future and reaction to therapy29.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma protein biomarkers are likewise being explored for analysis of AD. A few investigations have utilized immunological assay to quantify the concentration of different proteins in cerebrospinal fluid, reporting that those with AD indicate diminished amounts of the 42 amino acid of Aβ peptide (Aβ-42) and increment amounts of phosphorylated (PO4) tau peptide (P-tau)30,31. An ongoing longitudinal examination demonstrated that pattern Aβ-42/P-tau proportion could precisely foresee movement from MCI towards AD 32. In 2007, markers within plasma were suggested as a future option instead of the invasive CSF biomarkers for early diagnosis of AD33.

The best quality level for the determination of AD is an after death examination (post-mortem) neurotic assessment. The appearance and dispersion of amyloid plaques and NFT in the cerebrum is utilized to set up the findings and stages of the disease (Fig 6)33.

7 Treatment of AD

In spite of many years of investigation for the fundamental science of this disease and huge industrial pharmacy endeavors for creating treatments, no compelling treatment accessible to control this type of dementia or to hinder altogether complications of this neurodegenration till now. In spite that several disease-modifying drugs have been investigated, the newest approved agent "memantine" was affirmed by the US FDA in 2003. Therefore, the technique to recognize and scan drugs for the AD in the last years shifted to prevent clinical symptoms and prophylactic measurements34.

One difficulty for medication discovery in this area was an absence of approved objective tools and biomarkers that may be valuable as clinical parameters. This impediment, together with the long-term of the symptomatic-free prodromal stage that describes AD, leading to the enlistment in the studies of elders with effectively progressed histological stages associated with this illness. Subsequently, planning of management should regard as a conceivable issue in achievement percent of these medications, also specify the requirements for optimal evaluating criteria35.  

Ongoing advancement in creating novel parameters, involving neuroimaging procedures, with an accurate expecting value at predementia phases, and in hereditary hazard factor investigation, has prompted some reestablished good news. Numerous pharmaceutical organizations and public/private associations keep on concentrating for preventive action and treatment procedures. In the following, we try to highlight on the approved drugs and novel ongoing researches for management with a specific spotlight on the pathology and molecular biochemistry of the AD (Table 1)34.

7.1 Currently approved drugs

Successful pharmacological treatment for subjective disability identified with dementia stay a noteworthy urgent issue in practice. Just 4 medications were formulated and validated for managing this type of dementia (Table 1) and their administration is constrained. Of these, just 3 medications follow up on cholinergic pathways, including galantamine; rivastigmine; and donepezil. Every one of the three medications has anti-cholinesterase action, and the alkaloid "galantamine" is additionally considered as an allosteric modulator on the nicotinic- receptors. These medications are currently marketed and are indicated for gentle to serious dementia, in spite of the fact that they are regularly utilized for patients with predementia phases related with critical dynamic memory disability dependent on intellectual testing results34.

Memantine is the last marketed medication for an AD in the USA and it is the primary AD medication that focuses on the NMDA-receptors and glutamate neuronal pathway (Table 1). Abundance glutamate at excitatory neural connections with related cytotoxicity, perhaps because of diminished glutamate reuptake from microglia, has considered as one of the pathological mechanisms in the AD, where glutaminergic regulation influences neuronal dendritic in a mouse model. As needs be, riluzole, an inhibitor of glutaminergic neurotransmitter discharge and postsynaptic glutamate receptor signals, is in stage II preliminary researches35.

The outcomes of the early constrained clinical preliminary studies for the above approved medications are hard to give a helpful guideline for practical work. The long course of safety and activity of these medications are not cleared till now. There is no reasonable proof that any of these agents adjust or modulate the pathogenesis. Be that as it may, the medications appear to give some symptomatic help and are, for the most part, controlled as palliative treatment with the degree of relieving the decrease in personal satisfaction, with the goal of delaying the reduction in quality of life36.

7.2 Disease-modifying agents targeting the molecular pathway

7.2.1 Senile plaques as drug targets Modulation of amyloid-β production

The γ and β-secretase have considered as a fertilized area and a potential strategy for medications that may lessen Aβ production (Table 1). Reduction of Aβ generation has demonstrated troublesome, to a limited extent, as a result of the complex design of the γ-secretase. Any of this protein four subunit (nicastrin; presenilin; presenilin-enhancer 2; or front pharynx-damaged 1) is viewed as a potential target 37. Since γ-secretase architecture known to separate fifty diverse trans-membrane substrates other than APP, distinguishing proof of optimal catalyst inhibitor, for just APP handling, regard as a medication discovery challenge. After the clear disappointment of early γ-secretase-based medication competitors and antagonistic agents, as GI bleeding and immunocompromised effects, β-secretase, which is beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), turned into the optimal focus to reach Aβ-targeting therapeutics. Since this enzyme is a principal chemical for cutting APP, it assumes a significant effect in accumulation of Aβ, and role of it is expanded to both animal models and AD patients 38. Last novel and promising strategies used inhibitors of BACE1 were described by a high target specificity and enhancing pharmacokinetics profile39. Increasing amyloid-β degradation (decreasing aggregation)

Amyloid-β is continually broken down and its net amount in the CNS results from the balance between generation and degradation. Various peptidases referred to cumulatively as Aβ- degrading proteases (AβDPs) influence Aβ contents. The finding that AD patients will, in general, get insufficient CSF sample of Aβ, force a theory that expanded Aβ load could initiated not just by generation but, in addition, by reduced metabolism40,41. Despite that AβDPs cooperate to breaking Aβ, their particular sub-cellular limitation results from various types of peptides, with diverse effects in pathogenicity42.

The main report of clinically important immunotherapeutic agents  demonstrated that an active immunity accomplished with utilizing engineered Aβ42 fundamentally lessened Aβ-production, also avoided memory deficiency in Alzheimer- induced models43,44 (Table 1). It has been proposed that decrement of Aβ contents by monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can be clarified by two particular strategies: (a) activation of microglia via Fc- binding receptors (b) peripheral-sink effect. Former strategy may prompt the neuroinflammatory process, whereas the second inhibit Aβ accumulation by making a complex with and decreasing the soluble Aβ in the circulatory system and perhaps withdraw Aβ from the cerebrum. One obstacle in the utilization of this biotechnology for neurodegenerative disorders treatment has constrained the entrance of mAbs through blood-brain barrier and stimulation of immune reactions45.

Molecular chaperones help correct protein folding and mediate guarantee of protein shape under stressful states. In certain conditions, chaperones help exchange of unfolded-proteins toward proteasomal enzymes to breakdown46,47. Recently, expanding proof proposes that chaperones adapt the accumulation of amyloid, so consequently assume a defensive activity in the neuronal ailments described by protein misfolding48,49. The former speculation depends on a perception, upheld by in vitro-in vivo researches, that few chaperones (e.g., clusterin) and different heat shock proteins (e.g., HSP70 and HSP90)  can diminish altogether neurotic collection of proteins such as Aβ and other amyloid polypeptides50,51.  

7.2.2 Neurofibrillary tangles as drug targets (targeting tau aggregates)

Tau described as a locally non-folded microtubule-restricting peptide, present essentially within neuronal cells of the cerebrum. The six principle isoforms of tau in the neurons bring about different binding capacity for microtubules, thus binding assume a function for tendency of tauopathies. Mutated of this protein can cause unsettling influences of microtubules, prompting neural defects, where accumulated tau is neuronal toxic. A considerable lot of the targets have pleiotropic properties and in this way speak about difficulties for focusing on just one target. May be the best way ahead is to bring down tau in cerebrum via focusing on stabilizing tau configuration; tau production; or clearing hyper-phosphorylated tau aggregates (P-tau) (Table 1). Active immunization to P-tau is a feasible method for generation of specific antibodies to the targeting molecules52.

7.3 Disease-modifying agents targeting cellular system

7.3.1 Interfering with immunity and neuroinflammation

Alzheimer cerebral tissue shows clear proof of astrogliosis and further inflammatory and immunological-mediated events encompassing amyloid production. Neuromicroglia, which control numerous homeostatic capacities and intervene the CNS immune reaction, persistently protect the normal brain, looking for indications of neuronal damage and are prepared to give trophic help to CNS. When brain injured, they act as a fundamental type of active immunity; they move to encompass the affected region and clear cellular debris53.

Many evidences demonstrating that microglial overactivation (or microglial response to the neuroinflammatory process) is connected with the development of amyloid plaques and AD advancement. Alzheimer`s cerebellar tissue shows overexpression of chemokines in light of microglia- associated inflammation, which might be engaged with plaque-related neurodegeneration 54.

Convincing proof reported that antibodies can scavenge Aβ folds via stimulating neuromicroglia and activating Fcγ-based macrophages. Also, the small molecules indicated empowering outcomes in controlling this disease by their effect against neuromicroglia (Table 1)55.

The relationship between AD and neuroinflammation proposed a strategy that NSAIDs may have therapeutic role in this disease by overwhelming beneficial effects on harmful one (Fig 7). In any case, many NSAIDs failed in clinical preliminary studies (e.g., ibuprofen and flurizan), most likely as a result of inappropriate pharmacodynamics profiles 56.

The microbial-killing effect of Aβ may shield tissues from microbes by agglutination of infecting substances using oligomerizing mechanism. According to the AD pathology, it`s proposed that innate immune dysregulation of AD prompting Aβ accumulation. Regardless of whether an "infectious theory" for AD pathogenesis is substantiated stays to be resolved, yet this new theory may open the door for drugs discovery in the future57.

7.3.2 Targeting metabolic disorders

ApoE4 molecule is a noteworthy hazard in progression of dementia and type 2 diabetes mellitus58,59 where several biochemical examinations have connected energy metabolism and overweight with AD60,61. Lessening caloric consumption and sticking to a "Mediterranean eating regimen" seems to enhance intellectual wellbeing62,63. Insulin resistance can prompt hyperinsulinemia, in this manner occupying the insulin-degrading enzyme which is basic for Aβ breakdown64. Without a doubt, during investigations of a mouse model and human preliminary studies, diabetes- modifying agents caused intellectual enhancement. Along these lines, insulin post-receptor pathway is by all accounts a novel restorative focus for AD65.

8 Future perspectives

The complex molecular pathology of the AD, including Aβ accumulation, tauopathy, and neuronal inflammation, isn`t completely comprehended. As of late, a gathering of scientists suggest a classification to be utilized as a structure where patients can arranged depending on positivity or negativity of 3 key components: (1) Aβ (abbreviated by A);  (2) NFTs (abbreviated by T); (3) neurodegeneration (abbreviated by N) and supplemented via intellectual assessment (A/T/N order) 65.

Till now, medical outcome evaluations described as subjective rather than objective due to unavailability of lab measurements for AD advancement. In spite of the fact that advancement in early symptomatic detection has been made, there is a critical requirement for feasible analytic tests that recognize the most sensitive biomarkers of ailment. Much more fundamentals on AD and other different degenerative ailments of CNS yet required to be learned. Assembling and arranging the multidisciplinary researches expected to create successful AD medications, and this requires remarkable public/private organizations work and universal coordinated effort 66.

9 Conclusion

This survey has given a review of pathogenesis and proposed disease-modifying agents for the AD. A problematic issue up to this point is disappointment of medications in preliminary researches, attributed to non simplified estimating medicament viability in the AD with prodromal stage and extent of complications that may change broadly from person to person.

10 Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thanks Mustansiryiah University (www., Baghdad- Iraq for its support in the present work.

11 Conflict of interests


12 Author’s contributions

BARM, BTS, and SYJ carried out the literature review and draft the manuscript. BARM participated in the data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

13 References

  1. Alzheimer A. About a peculiar disease of the cerebral cortex. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1987; 1: 3-8.
  2. Alzheimer A. Uber eine eigenartige Erkrankung der Hirnridne [About a Peculiar Disease of the Cerebral Cortex]. Allg Z Psychiatr. 1907; 64: 146-48.
  3. Maurer K, Volk S, Gerbaldo H. Auguste D and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1997; 349(9064): 1546-9.
  4. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3): 263-9.
  5. Gilman S. Oxford American handbook of neurology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 2010.
  6. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007; 29: 125-32.
  7. Shadlen M, Larson E. Evaluation of cognitive impairment and dementia. In: Basow D, ed. Waltham, MA: Up To Date; 2010.
  8. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer`s Dement. 2011; 7: 280-92.
  9. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM. Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 329-44.
  10. Ott A, Breteler MM, van Harskamp F, Claus JJ, van der Cammen TJ, Grobbee DE, et al. Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: association with education. The Rotterdam study. BMJ 1995; 310: 970-3.
  11. Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 77sr1.
  12. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, McCann JJ, Beckett LA, Evans DA. Is the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease greater for women than for men? Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153: 132-6.
  13. Reiman EM, Chen K, Alexander GE, Caselli RJ, Bandy D, Osborne D, et al. Correlations between apolipoprotein E epsilon4 gene dose and brain-imaging measurements of regional hypometabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 8299-302.
  14. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11: 1006-12.
  15. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10: 819-28.
  16. Mann DM. Pyramidal nerve cell loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegeneration. 1996; 5: 423-7.
  17. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002; 298: 789-91.
  18. Norfray JF, Provenzale JM. Alzheimer’s disease: neuropathologic findings and recent advances in imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182: 3-13.
  19. Jack CR, Petersen RC, Xu YC, Waring SC, O’Brien PC, Tangalos EG, et al. Medial temporal atrophy on MRI in normal aging and very mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1997; 49: 786-94.
  20. Bozoki AC, Korolev IO, Davis NC, Hoisington LA, Berger KL. Disruption of limbic white matter pathways in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a DTI/FDG-PET study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012; 33: 1792-1802.
  21. Beach TG, Monsell SE, Phillips LE, Kukull W. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005-2010. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012; 71: 266-73.
  22. Rang HP, Ritter JM. Rang and Dales Pharmacology. 8th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2013, 488.
  23. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices ofDepartment of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1984; 34: 939-44.
  24. Camicioli R. Distinguishing different dementias. Can Rev Alzheimer’s Dis Other Dement. 2006; 9: 4-11.
  25. Whitwell JL, Petersen RC, Negash S, Weigand SD, Kantarci K, Ivnik RJ, et al. Patterns of atrophy differ among specific subtypes of mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2007; 64: 1130-8.
  26. Rabinovici GD, Seeley WW, Kim EJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rascovsky K, Pagliaro TA, et al. Distinct MRI atrophy patterns in autopsy-proven Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2007; 22: 474-88.
  27. Devanand DP, Pradhaban G, Liu X, Khandji A, De Santi S, Segal S, et al. Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment: prediction of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007; 68: 828-36.
  28. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE, et al. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulated cortex in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1997; 42: 85-94.
  29. Mosconi L, Tsui WH, Herholz K, Pupi A, Drzezga A, Lucignani G, et al. Multicenter standardized 18F-FDG PET diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and other dementias. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49: 390-8.
  30. Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 2012; 8: S1-68.
  31. Vemuri P, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Shaw LM, Trojanowski JQ, Weiner MW, et al. MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: diagnostic discrimination and cognitive correlations. Neurology. 2009; 73: 287-93.
  32. Buchhave P, Minthon L, Zetterberg H, Wallin AK, Blennow K, Hansson O. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of b-amyloid 1-42, but not of tau, are fully changed already 5 to 10 years before the onset of Alzheimer dementia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69: 98-106.
  33. Ray S, Britschgi M, Herbert C, Takeda-Uchimura Y, Boxer A, Blennow K, et al. Classification and prediction of clinical Alzheimer’s diagnosis based on plasma signaling proteins. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 1359-62.
  34. Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:455–532.
  35. Winblad B, Poritis N. Memantine in severe dementia: results of the 9M-Best Study (benefit and efficacy in severely demented patients during treatment with memantine). Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 1999 14:135–46.
  36. Pereira AC, Lambert HK, Grossman YS. Glutamatergic regulation prevents hippocampal-dependent age-related cognitive decline through dendritic spine clustering. PNAS. 2014; 111:18733–38.
  37. McCarthy JV, Twomey C, Wujek P. Presenilin-dependent regulated intramembrane proteolysis and gamma-secretase activity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009; 66:1534–55.
  38. Kandalepas PC, Sadleir KR, Eimer WA. The Alzheimer’s beta-secretase BACE1 localizes to normal presynaptic terminals and to dystrophic presynaptic terminals surrounding amyloid plaques. Acta Neuropathol. 2013; 126:329–52.
  39. Atwal JK, Chen Y, Chiu C. A therapeutic antibody targeting BACE1 inhibits amyloid-beta production in vivo. Sci. Transl. Med.  2011; 3:84ra43.
  40. Selkoe DJ. Clearing the brain’s amyloid cobwebs. Neuron 2001; 32:177–80.
  41. Mawuenyega KG, Sigurdson W, Ovod V. Decreased clearance of CNS beta-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2010; 330:1774.
  42. SaidoT, LeissringMA. Proteolytic degradation of amyloid beta-protein. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012; 2:a006379.
  43. Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W. Immunization with amyloid-beta attenuates Alzheimer disease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse. Nature. 1999; 400:173–77.
  44. Morgan D, Diamond DM, Gottschall PE. A beta peptide vaccination prevents memory loss in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 2000; 408:982–85.
  45. Moreth J, Mavoungou C, Schindowski K. Passive anti-amyloid immunotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease: What are the most promising targets? Immun. Ageing. 2013; 10:18.
  46. Haass C, Selkoe DJ. Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer’s amyloid beta-peptide. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007; 8:101–12.
  47. Englund H, Sehlin D, Johansson AS. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J. Neurochem. 2007; 103:334–45.
  48. Sevigny J, Chiao P, Bussi`ereT. The antibody aducanumab reduces Aβplaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2016; 537:50–56.
  49. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science. 2002; 295:1852–58.
  50. Arosio P, Michaels TC, Linse S. Kinetic analysis reveals the diversity of microscopic mechanisms through which molecular chaperones suppress amyloid formation. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7:10948.
  51. Gupta R, Kapoor N, Raleigh DP. Nucleobindin 1 caps human islet amyloid polypeptide protofibrils to prevent amyloid fibril formation. J. Mol. Biol. 2012; 421:378–89.
  52. Caillet-Boudin M-LL, Bu´ee L, Sergeant N. Regulation of human MAPT gene expression. Mol. Neurodegeneration. 2015; 10:28.
  53. Hanisch UK, Kettenmann H. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 2007; 10:1387–94.
  54. Ransohoff RM. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: standing at the crossroads of immunobiology and neurobiology. Immunity.2009;31:711–21.
  55. Aisen PS, Gauthier S, Vellas B. Alzhemed: a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.Curr. Alzheimer Res.2007;4:473–78.
  56. Miguel-Alvarez M, Santos-Lozano A, Sanchis-Gomar F. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effect. Drugs Aging.2015;32:139–47.
  57. Kumar DKV, Choi SH, Washicosky KJ. Amyloid-β peptide protects against microbial infection in mouse and worm models of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med.2016;8:340ra72.
  58. Peila R, Rodriguez BL, Launer LJ. Type 2 diabetes, APOE gene, and the risk for dementia and related pathologies: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. Diabetes. 2002; 51:1256–62.
  59. Hughes TF, Borenstein AR, Schofield E. Association between late-life body mass index and dementia: the Kame Project. Neurology. 2009; 72:1741–46.
  60. Whitmer RA, Gunderson EP, Quesenberry CP. Body mass index in midlife and risk of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2007; 4:103–9.
  61. Kivipelto M, Ngandu T, Fratiglioni L. Obesity and vascular risk factors at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 2005; 62:1556–60.
  62. Scarmeas N, Luchsinger JA, Schupf N. Physical activity, diet, and risk of Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 2009; 302:627–37.
  63. Martin B, Mattson MP, Maudsley S. Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting: two potential diets for successful brain aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2006; 5:332–53.
  64. QiuWQ, Folstein MF. Insulin, insulin-degrading enzyme and amyloid-beta peptide in Alzheimer’s disease: review and hypothesis. Neurobiol Aging. 2006; 27:190–98.
  65. Heneka MT, Sastre M, Dumitrescu-Ozimek L. Acute treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone and ibuprofen reduce glial inflammation and Abeta1-42 levels in APPV717I transgenic mice. Brain J. Neurol. 2005; 128:1442–53.
  66. Lalotra S, Vaghela JS. Scientific Reports of Medicinal Plants Used for the Prevention and Treatment of Neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmaceutical and Biosciences Journal. 2019; 7(1): 15-25.